linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/7] re-enable DAX PMD support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20160817172111.GA30584@quack2.suse.cz>
Date:	Wed, 17 Aug 2016 19:21:11 +0200
From:	Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
To:	Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:	Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>,
	Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
	Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@...ger.ca>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.com>,
	linux-ext4 <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
	"linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org" <linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] re-enable DAX PMD support

On Wed 17-08-16 10:21:24, Ross Zwisler wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 02:14:14PM -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 2:11 PM, Ross Zwisler
> > <ross.zwisler@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> > > On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 01:21:47PM -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
> > >> On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 12:09 PM, Ross Zwisler
> > >> <ross.zwisler@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> > >> > DAX PMDs have been disabled since Jan Kara introduced DAX radix tree based
> > >> > locking.  This series allows DAX PMDs to participate in the DAX radix tree
> > >> > based locking scheme so that they can be re-enabled.
> > >>
> > >> Looks good to me.
> > >>
> > >> > This series restores DAX PMD functionality back to what it was before it
> > >> > was disabled.  There is still a known issue between DAX PMDs and hole
> > >> > punch, which I am currently working on and which I plan to address with a
> > >> > separate series.
> > >>
> > >> Perhaps we should hold off on applying patch 6 and 7 until after the
> > >> hole-punch fix is ready?
> > >
> > > Sure, I'm cool with holding off on patch 7 (the Kconfig change) until after
> > > the hole punch fix is ready.
> > >
> > > I don't see a reason to hold off on patch 6, though?  It stands on it's own,
> > > implements the correct locking, and doesn't break anything.
> > 
> > Whoops, I just meant 7.
> 
> Well, it looks like the hole punch case is much improved since I tested it
> last!  :)  I used to be able to generate a few different kernel BUGs when hole
> punching DAX PMDs, but those have apparently been fixed in the mm layer since
> I was last testing, which admittedly was quite a long time ago (February?).
> 
> The only issue I was able to find with DAX PMD hole punching was that ext4
> wasn't properly doing a writeback before the hole was unmapped and the radix
> tree entries were removed.  This issue applies equally to the 4k case, so I've
> submitted a bug fix for v4.8:
> 
> https://lists.01.org/pipermail/linux-nvdimm/2016-August/006621.html
> 
> With that applied, I don't know of any more issues related to DAX PMDs and
> hole punch.  I've tested ext4 and XFS (ext2 doesn't support hole punch), and
> they both properly do a writeback of all affected PMDs, fully unmap all
> affected PMDs, and remove the radix tree entries.  I've tested that new page
> faults for addresses previously covered by the old PMDs generate new page
> faults, and 4k pages are now faulted in because the block allocator no longer
> has 2MiB contiguous allocations.
> 
> One question (probably for Jan): should the above ext4 fix be marked for
> stable?

Yes, probably it should be.

								Honza
-- 
Jan Kara <jack@...e.com>
SUSE Labs, CR