[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1471515309.7011.12.camel@localhost>
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2016 10:15:15 +0000
From: "Wei, Jiangang" <weijg.fnst@...fujitsu.com>
To: "mingo@...nel.org" <mingo@...nel.org>
CC: "tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"hpa@...or.com" <hpa@...or.com>,
"mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>, "bp@...e.de" <bp@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] x86/smpboot: Check APIC ID before setting up
default routing
On Thu, 2016-08-18 at 11:47 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Wei Jiangang <weijg.fnst@...fujitsu.com> wrote:
>
> > Check the boot APIC ID firstly,
> > and then setup the default routing of APIC looks better.
> >
> > And move default_setup_apic_routing() close to apic_bsp_setup(),
> > which staying in step with the codes in APIC_init_uniprocessor().
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Wei Jiangang <weijg.fnst@...fujitsu.com>
> > ---
> > arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c | 3 +--
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> If it's not a bug then please clearly note so in the changelog and
> explain why the change results in better code.
It's not a bug.
The combination of default_setup_apic_routing() and apic_bsp_setup() is
used to enable APIC mode. If the return of read_apic_id() is not equal
to boot_cpu_physical_apicid, it means the APIC ID of current CPU‘s local
APIC is unexpected and enable APIC mode maybe fail. so no need to set
up the apic routing. That's why I want to move
default_setup_apic_routing() behind checking the boot APIC ID.
Sorry for obscure commit message. I will improve it in next version.
>
> If it's fixing a bug/misfeature then please fix the changelog to
> conform to the standard changelog style:
>
> - first describe the symptoms of the bug - how does a user notice?
>
> - then describe how the code behaves today and how that is causing the bug
>
> - and then only describe how it's fixed.
Thanks for your detailed explanation. I'll keep in my mind.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Ingo
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists