[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <57B5A5E8.3040606@zoho.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2016 20:11:20 +0800
From: zijun_hu <zijun_hu@...o.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, dhowells@...hat.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, zijun_hu@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] rbtree: correct mask for extracting node's parent
On 08/18/2016 05:01 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 04:19:10PM +0800, zijun_hu wrote:
>> From: zijun_hu <zijun_hu@....com>
>>
>> for LP64 ABI, struct rb_node aligns at 8 bytes boundary due to
>> sizeof(long) == 8 normally, so 0x07 should be used to extract
>> node's parent rather than 0x03
>
> Doesn't matter though, in practise. The remaining bits are always 0.
>
okay, understand
it maybe more readable to replace hard coding numbers by macros
Powered by blists - more mailing lists