[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <dc392fd9-f848-8ad4-13b2-549fc1a57516@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 20 Aug 2016 08:51:26 +1200
From: "Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" <mtk.manpages@...il.com>
To: Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>
Cc: mtk.manpages@...il.com, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@...cle.com>, socketpair@...il.com,
Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...com>, Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
linux-api@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/8] pipe: fix limit checking in pipe_set_size()
On 08/19/2016 05:48 PM, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> Hi Michael,
>
> Since you're changing this code, it's probably worth swapping the size
> check and capable() below to save a function call in the normal path :
>
> On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 05:25:35PM +1200, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote:
>> + if (nr_pages > pipe->buffers) {
>> + if (!capable(CAP_SYS_RESOURCE) && size > pipe_max_size) {
>
> => if (size > pipe_max_size && !capable(CAP_SYS_RESOURCE)) {
>
>> + ret = -EPERM;
>> + goto out_revert_acct;
>> + } else if ((too_many_pipe_buffers_hard(pipe->user) ||
>> + too_many_pipe_buffers_soft(pipe->user)) &&
>> + !capable(CAP_SYS_RESOURCE) &&
>> + !capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN)) {
>> + ret = -EPERM;
>> + goto out_revert_acct;
>> + }
>> + }
> (...)
Thanks, Willy. Fixed for the next iteration. (And I made the same fix made
also in the 8/8 patch).
Cheers,
Michael
--
Michael Kerrisk
Linux man-pages maintainer; http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/
Linux/UNIX System Programming Training: http://man7.org/training/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists