linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] ARM: multi_v7_defconfig: Don't attempt to enable schedutil governor as module

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <7dd6278d-bdc4-14e5-6b2e-062a59cd29d4@osg.samsung.com>
Date:   Fri, 19 Aug 2016 09:46:28 -0400
From:   Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@....samsung.com>
To:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, arm@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ARM: multi_v7_defconfig: Don't attempt to enable
 schedutil governor as module

Hello Krzysztof,

On 08/19/2016 09:40 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 08/19/2016 03:12 PM, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
>> The schedutil CPUFreq governor could be built as a module but the commit
>> 58919e83c85c ("cpufreq / sched: Pass flags to cpufreq_update_util()")
>> made it non-modular so attempting to enable as module leads to a warning:
>>
>> warning: symbol value 'm' invalid for CPU_FREQ_GOV_SCHEDUTIL
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@....samsung.com>
>>
>> ---
>>
>>  arch/arm/configs/multi_v7_defconfig | 2 +-
>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> Looks good.
> 
> Applied... wait, no, these are not in samsung-soc list so they miss also
> from patchwork. For reference:
> Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>
>

Sigh, get_maintainers.pl suggested me an insanely large cc list so I added
it manually... but I forgot linux-samsung-soc. I'll post v2.

> Please post it to linux-samsung-soc, unless it goes through arm-soc or
> other tree.
>

I think is OK if both patches go through your tree.

> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
> 

Best regards,
-- 
Javier Martinez Canillas
Open Source Group
Samsung Research America