[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <fe0ad949-ecd1-e0fe-3d9b-04a35b9dc172@osg.samsung.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2016 09:52:47 -0400
From: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@....samsung.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, arm@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ARM: multi_v7_defconfig: Don't attempt to enable
schedutil governor as module
Hello Krzysztof,
On 08/19/2016 09:46 AM, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
>
> On 08/19/2016 09:40 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 08/19/2016 03:12 PM, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
>>> The schedutil CPUFreq governor could be built as a module but the commit
>>> 58919e83c85c ("cpufreq / sched: Pass flags to cpufreq_update_util()")
>>> made it non-modular so attempting to enable as module leads to a warning:
>>>
>>> warning: symbol value 'm' invalid for CPU_FREQ_GOV_SCHEDUTIL
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@....samsung.com>
>>>
>>> ---
>>>
>>> arch/arm/configs/multi_v7_defconfig | 2 +-
>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> Looks good.
>>
>> Applied... wait, no, these are not in samsung-soc list so they miss also
>> from patchwork. For reference:
>> Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>
>>
>
> Sigh, get_maintainers.pl suggested me an insanely large cc list so I added
> it manually... but I forgot linux-samsung-soc. I'll post v2.
>
Damn... and now I forgot to include your collected tags in v2. I should not
post patches before having enough coffee, sorry about that.
Please let me know if you don't mind or if you prefer a resend.
Best regards,
--
Javier Martinez Canillas
Open Source Group
Samsung Research America
Powered by blists - more mailing lists