linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/1] drm/amdgpu/gmc7: remove dead code

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sun, 21 Aug 2016 11:49:57 -0700
From:   Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To:     Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@....de>,
        Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@....com>,
        Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>
Cc:     David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
        Chunming Zhou <David1.Zhou@....com>,
        Ken Wang <Qingqing.Wang@....com>,
        Tom St Denis <tom.stdenis@....com>,
        dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] drm/amdgpu/gmc7: remove dead code

On Sun, 2016-08-21 at 20:45 +0200, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> On 08/21/2016 08:29 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
> > On Sun, 2016-08-21 at 20:06 +0200, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> > > In an if block for (running == 0) running cannot be non-zero.
> > This code could also be better unindented by one level
> > (all of the block would fit 80 columns) by changing:
> > 
> > 	if (running == 0) {
> > 		[code...]
> > 	}
> > 
> > 	return 0;
> > 
> > to:
> > 
> > 	if (running)
> > 		return 0;
> > 
> > 	[code...]
> > 
> > 	return 0;
> Should I revise my patch?
> Or should this be an additional patch?

If you want to do it, an additional patch is probably best.