linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] rtl8712: pwrctrl_priv: Replace semaphore lock with mutex

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20160821162621.GA13201@kroah.com>
Date:   Sun, 21 Aug 2016 18:26:21 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Binoy Jayan <binoy.jayan@...aro.org>
Cc:     Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@...inger.net>,
        Florian Schilhabel <florian.c.schilhabel@...glemail.com>,
        driverdev-devel@...uxdriverproject.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] rtl8712: pwrctrl_priv: Replace semaphore lock
 with mutex

On Thu, Jun 02, 2016 at 09:54:10AM +0530, Binoy Jayan wrote:
> The semaphore 'lock' in 'pwrctrl_priv' is used as a simple mutex, so it
> should be written as one. Semaphores are going away in the future.
> _enter_pwrlock was using down_interruptible(), so the lock could be broken
> by sending a signal. This could be a bug, because nothing checks the return
> code here. Hence, using mutex_lock instead of the interruptible version.
> Removing the now unused _enter_pwrlock and _down_sema.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Binoy Jayan <binoy.jayan@...aro.org>
> Reviewed-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
> Tested-by: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@...inger.net>
> ---
> This patch depends on the following patch:
>   rtl8712: intf_priv: Replace semaphore lock with completion

This one patch doesn't apply to my tree for some odd reason.

Can you rebase it on my staging-testing branch and resend it?

thanks,

greg k-h