linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 00/10] Optimize sched avgs computation and implement flat util hierarchy

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 23 Aug 2016 07:26:37 +0800
From:   Yuyang Du <yuyang.du@...el.com>
To:     peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...nel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     bsegall@...gle.com, pjt@...gle.com, morten.rasmussen@....com,
        vincent.guittot@...aro.org, dietmar.eggemann@....com,
        matt@...eblueprint.co.uk, umgwanakikbuti@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 00/10] Optimize sched avgs computation and implement
 flat util hierarchy

Hi Peter and others,

Could you give this patchset a look?

Thanks,
Yuyang

On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 08:23:52AM +0800, Yuyang Du wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 08:14:45AM +0800, Yuyang Du wrote:
> > Hi Peter,
> > 
> > I should have sent out my flat util hierarchy implementation long time ago,
> > actually code was there but not rebased. I finally have time to do this,
> > so here it is. There are also other proposals to solve migrated tasks' util
> > mobility problem, such as the ones from Dietmar and Vincent.
> > 
> > The sched avgs computation optimization was initiated for the flat util thing,
> > so I send them out together.
> > 
> > According to Morten and Ben's feedback, I removed 32-bit as a period's upper
> > bound limit. So, thanks a lot to them.
> > 
> 
> To compare the effectiveness of the flat util hierarchy, a simple experiment
> was done: rt-app to generate a 50% duty-cycling workload (100us/200us), and
> in the meantime a script to set the CPU affinity of the task, alternating
> to taskset the task to run on CPU x and CPU y every 0.3 sec, so forcing the
> task to ping-pong migrate. By auto-group and ssh itself, the task under test
> is at the third level task group.
> 
> So compare the top cfs_rq's util_avg (group_hierarchy.jpg) vs. the rq's util_avg
> (flat_hierarchy.jpg)
> 
> Thanks,
> Yuyang