[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAGo_u6p3Bm+zGDtxpOyT+DeGN8_XPWWE0zhCYuxsH47n41Z8jg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2016 13:45:05 -0500
From: Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>
To: Lokesh Vutla <lokeshvutla@...com>
Cc: Russell King <rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk>,
Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
Santosh Shilimkar <ssantosh@...nel.org>,
Tero Kristo <t-kristo@...com>, Dave Gerlach <d-gerlach@...com>,
"linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Andrew F . Davis" <afd@...com>,
dt list <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Russ Dill <Russ.Dill@...com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] firmware: ti_sci: Add support for Device control
On Sun, Aug 21, 2016 at 10:56 PM, Lokesh Vutla <lokeshvutla@...com> wrote:
>> /**
>> + * tis_sci_is_response_ack() - Generic ACK/NACK message checkup
>> + * @r: pointer to response buffer
>> + *
>> + * Return: true if the response was an ACK, else returns false.
>> + */
>> +static inline bool tis_sci_is_response_ack(void *r)
>
> May be just ti_sci_is_response_ack() to be consistent? or you wanted to
> keep it tis_sci* ?
Uggh.. Fat fingered that one.. thanks for catching.. fixed and will
post a v2 next week if there is no further comments
---
Regards,
Nishanth Menon
Powered by blists - more mailing lists