[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1608241049270.5714@nanos>
Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2016 10:51:20 +0200 (CEST)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Bin Gao <bin.gao@...ux.intel.com>
cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, bin.gao@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] x86/tsc: Set X86_FEATURE_TSC_RELIABLE to skip refined
calibration
On Tue, 16 Aug 2016, Bin Gao wrote:
> On some newer Intel x86 processors/SoCs the TSC frequency can be directly
> calculated by factors read from specific MSR registers or from a cpuid
> leaf (0x15). TSC frequency calculated by native msr/cpuid is absolutely
> accurate so we should always skip calibrating TSC aginst another clock,
> e.g. PIT, HPET, etc. So we want to skip the refined calibration by setting
> the X86_FEATURE_TSC_RELIABLE flag. Existing code setting the flag by
> set_cpu_cap() doesn't work as the flag is cleared later in identify_cpu().
> A cpu caps flag is not cleared only if it's set by setup_force_cpu_cap().
> This patch converted set_cpu_cap() to setup_force_cpu_cap() to ensure
> refined calibration is skipped.
>
> We had a test on Intel CherryTrail platform: the 24 hours time drift is
> 3.6 seconds if refined calibration was not skipped while the drift is less
> than 0.6 second when refined calibration was skipped.
>
> Correctly setting the X86_FEATURE_TSC_RELIABLE flag also guarantees TSC is
> not monitored by timekeeping watchdog because on most of these system TSC
> is the only reliable clocksource. HPET, for instance, works but may not
> be reliable. So kernel may report a physically reliable TSC is not reliable
> just because a physically not reliable HPET is acting as timekeeping
> watchdog.
What about non SoC systems where the MSR is available, but we still see that
cross socket TSC wreckage? This change will prevent the watchdog from
detecting that.
Thanks,
tglx
Powered by blists - more mailing lists