[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAGXu5j+EG2eyVQAp2Bk0JrV0B4QeLjRYnQj54QBTDh8CbCvyDg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2016 21:37:01 -0400
From: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Nilay Vaish <nilayvaish@...il.com>,
"the arch/x86 maintainers" <x86@...nel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>,
Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@....com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 54/57] x86/mm: convert arch_within_stack_frames() to
use the new unwinder
On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 5:08 PM, Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 01:31:20PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>> On Aug 23, 2016 12:11 AM, "Linus Torvalds"
>> So the fact that this seems to have any significant effect on
>> performance suggests to me that it's being run unnecessarily
>
> Yeah, I think check_object_size() is being run unnecessarily in a lot of
> cases. Calling it only when size is non-const would probably speed
> things up a lot.
Yup, this is at the top of my list to fix. The non-const is only done
on a handful of architectures, and it needs to be done everywhere.
-Kees
--
Kees Cook
Nexus Security
Powered by blists - more mailing lists