[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160824113226.3fbcc285@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2016 11:32:26 +1000
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>,
Intel Graphics <intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
DRI <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>
Cc: linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Lyude <cpaul@...hat.com>,
Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...el.com>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the drm-intel tree with the
drm-intel-fixes tree
Hi all,
Today's linux-next merge of the drm-intel tree got a conflict in:
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
between commit:
f403372658fc ("drm/i915/skl: Add support for the SAGV, fix underrun hangs")
(which is a chery-pick of commit 656d1b89e5ff from the drm-intel tree)
from the drm-intel-fixes tree and commit:
62e0fb880123 ("drm/i915/skl: Update plane watermarks atomically during plane updates")
from the drm-intel tree.
I fixed it up (I just used the drm-intel tree version) and can carry the
fix as necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned,
but any non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream
maintainer when your tree is submitted for merging. You may also want
to consider cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to
minimise any particularly complex conflicts.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
Powered by blists - more mailing lists