[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160825025345.GA6387@packer-debian-8-amd64.digitalocean.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2016 22:53:45 -0400
From: Jessica Yu <jeyu@...hat.com>
To: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
Cc: Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>, Miroslav Benes <mbenes@...e.cz>,
Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
live-patching@...r.kernel.org, Chunyu Hu <chuhu@...hat.com>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
Subject: Re: livepatch/module: make TAINT_LIVEPATCH module-specific
+++ Josh Poimboeuf [24/08/16 16:33 -0500]:
>There's no reliable way to determine which module tainted the kernel
>with CONFIG_LIVEPATCH. For example, /sys/module/<klp module>/taint
>doesn't report it. Neither does the "mod -t" command in the crash tool.
>
>Make it crystal clear who the guilty party is by converting
>CONFIG_LIVEPATCH to a module taint flag.
>
>This changes the behavior a bit: now the the flag gets set when the
>module is loaded, rather than when it's enabled.
Did a quick sanity check and verified the module taint
shows up in crash and sysfs as expected, looks good.
>Reviewed-by: Chunyu Hu <chuhu@...hat.com>
>Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
Acked-by: Jessica Yu <jeyu@...hat.com>
>---
> kernel/livepatch/core.c | 3 ---
> kernel/module.c | 35 ++++++++++++-----------------------
> 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
>
>diff --git a/kernel/livepatch/core.c b/kernel/livepatch/core.c
>index 5fbabe0..af46438 100644
>--- a/kernel/livepatch/core.c
>+++ b/kernel/livepatch/core.c
>@@ -545,9 +545,6 @@ static int __klp_enable_patch(struct klp_patch *patch)
> list_prev_entry(patch, list)->state == KLP_DISABLED)
> return -EBUSY;
>
>- pr_notice_once("tainting kernel with TAINT_LIVEPATCH\n");
>- add_taint(TAINT_LIVEPATCH, LOCKDEP_STILL_OK);
>-
> pr_notice("enabling patch '%s'\n", patch->mod->name);
>
> klp_for_each_object(patch, obj) {
>diff --git a/kernel/module.c b/kernel/module.c
>index 529efae..fd5f95b 100644
>--- a/kernel/module.c
>+++ b/kernel/module.c
>@@ -1149,6 +1149,8 @@ static size_t module_flags_taint(struct module *mod, char *buf)
> buf[l++] = 'C';
> if (mod->taints & (1 << TAINT_UNSIGNED_MODULE))
> buf[l++] = 'E';
>+ if (mod->taints & (1 << TAINT_LIVEPATCH))
>+ buf[l++] = 'K';
> /*
> * TAINT_FORCED_RMMOD: could be added.
> * TAINT_CPU_OUT_OF_SPEC, TAINT_MACHINE_CHECK, TAINT_BAD_PAGE don't
>@@ -2791,26 +2793,6 @@ static int copy_chunked_from_user(void *dst, const void __user *usrc, unsigned l
> return 0;
> }
>
>-#ifdef CONFIG_LIVEPATCH
>-static int find_livepatch_modinfo(struct module *mod, struct load_info *info)
>-{
>- mod->klp = get_modinfo(info, "livepatch") ? true : false;
>-
>- return 0;
>-}
>-#else /* !CONFIG_LIVEPATCH */
>-static int find_livepatch_modinfo(struct module *mod, struct load_info *info)
>-{
>- if (get_modinfo(info, "livepatch")) {
>- pr_err("%s: module is marked as livepatch module, but livepatch support is disabled",
>- mod->name);
>- return -ENOEXEC;
>- }
>-
>- return 0;
>-}
>-#endif /* CONFIG_LIVEPATCH */
>-
> /* Sets info->hdr and info->len. */
> static int copy_module_from_user(const void __user *umod, unsigned long len,
> struct load_info *info)
>@@ -2969,9 +2951,16 @@ static int check_modinfo(struct module *mod, struct load_info *info, int flags)
> "is unknown, you have been warned.\n", mod->name);
> }
>
>- err = find_livepatch_modinfo(mod, info);
>- if (err)
>- return err;
>+ if (get_modinfo(info, "livepatch")) {
>+ if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_LIVEPATCH)) {
>+ pr_err("%s: module is marked as livepatch module, but livepatch support is disabled\n",
>+ mod->name);
>+ return -ENOEXEC;
>+ }
>+ mod->klp = true;
>+ pr_warn("%s: loading livepatch module.\n", mod->name);
>+ add_taint_module(mod, TAINT_LIVEPATCH, LOCKDEP_STILL_OK);
>+ }
>
> /* Set up license info based on the info section */
> set_license(mod, get_modinfo(info, "license"));
>--
>2.7.4
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists