[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LNX.2.00.1608250252380.22028@cbobk.fhfr.pm>
Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2016 02:54:21 +0200 (CEST)
From: Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>
To: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
cc: Jessica Yu <jeyu@...hat.com>, Miroslav Benes <mbenes@...e.cz>,
Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
live-patching@...r.kernel.org, Chunyu Hu <chuhu@...hat.com>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] livepatch/module: make TAINT_LIVEPATCH module-specific
On Wed, 24 Aug 2016, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> There's no reliable way to determine which module tainted the kernel
> with CONFIG_LIVEPATCH. For example, /sys/module/<klp module>/taint
> doesn't report it. Neither does the "mod -t" command in the crash tool.
>
> Make it crystal clear who the guilty party is by converting
> CONFIG_LIVEPATCH to a module taint flag.
>
> This changes the behavior a bit: now the the flag gets set when the
> module is loaded, rather than when it's enabled.
>
> Reviewed-by: Chunyu Hu <chuhu@...hat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
I like this change.
Rusty, in case you're okay with it as well, could you please either
provide your Ack so that I could take it through livepatching.git?
Alternatively, if you prefer to merge this through your tree, please feel
free to add
Acked-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>
Thanks,
--
Jiri Kosina
SUSE Labs
Powered by blists - more mailing lists