[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMuHMdUC9d4KNPTDY51DCptmMFQ1F2jLmRDO9WLt=WZA09qRew@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2016 09:52:47 +0200
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
To: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>
Cc: linux-clk <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Linux MIPS Mailing List <linux-mips@...ux-mips.org>,
Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@...il.com>,
Eric Miao <eric.y.miao@...il.com>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"adi-buildroot-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net"
<adi-buildroot-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
Greg Ungerer <gerg@...ux-m68k.org>,
linux-m68k <linux-m68k@...ts.linux-m68k.org>,
bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com,
Wan ZongShun <mcuos.com@...il.com>,
Steven Miao <realmz6@...il.com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] clk: let clk_disable() return immediately if clk is NULL
On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 7:26 PM, Masahiro Yamada
<yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com> wrote:
> Many of clk_disable() implementations just return for NULL pointer,
> but this check is missing from some. Let's make it tree-wide
> consistent. It will allow clock consumers to call clk_disable()
> without NULL pointer check.
>
> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>
> Acked-by: Greg Ungerer <gerg@...inux.org>
> Acked-by: Wan Zongshun <mcuos.com@...il.com>
Acked-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
Powered by blists - more mailing lists