[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160826152915.GH30302@arm.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2016 16:29:16 +0100
From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
To: Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@...wei.com>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>,
devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Zefan Li <lizefan@...wei.com>, Xinwei Hu <huxinwei@...wei.com>,
Tianhong Ding <dingtianhong@...wei.com>,
Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 10/14] arm64/numa: define numa_distance as array to
simplify code
On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 03:44:49PM +0800, Zhen Lei wrote:
> 1. MAX_NUMNODES is base on CONFIG_NODES_SHIFT, the default value of the
> latter is very small now.
> 2. Suppose the default value of MAX_NUMNODES is enlarged to 64, so the
> size of numa_distance is 4K, it's still acceptable if run the Image
> on other processors.
> 3. It will make function __node_distance quicker than before.
>
> Signed-off-by: Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@...wei.com>
> ---
> arch/arm64/include/asm/numa.h | 1 -
> arch/arm64/mm/numa.c | 74 +++----------------------------------------
> 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 70 deletions(-)
I fail to see the advantages of this patch. Do you have some compelling
performance figures or something?
Will
Powered by blists - more mailing lists