[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160826153550.GI30302@arm.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2016 16:35:51 +0100
From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
To: Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@...wei.com>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>,
devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Zefan Li <lizefan@...wei.com>, Xinwei Hu <huxinwei@...wei.com>,
Tianhong Ding <dingtianhong@...wei.com>,
Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 14/14] Documentation: remove the constraint on the
distances of node pairs
On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 03:44:53PM +0800, Zhen Lei wrote:
> Update documentation. This limit is unneccessary.
>
> Signed-off-by: Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@...wei.com>
> Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
> ---
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/numa.txt | 1 -
> 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/numa.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/numa.txt
> index 21b3505..c0ea4a7 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/numa.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/numa.txt
> @@ -48,7 +48,6 @@ distance (memory latency) between all numa nodes.
>
> Note:
> 1. Each entry represents distance from first node to second node.
> - The distances are equal in either direction.
Hmm, so what happens now if firmware provides a description where both
distances (in either direction) are supplied, but are different?
Will
Powered by blists - more mailing lists