linux-kernel - Re: DAX can not work on virtual nvdimm device

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <600ac51c-0f61-6e53-9bfa-669c85494d1f@linux.intel.com>
Date:   Mon, 29 Aug 2016 15:54:10 +0800
From:   Xiao Guangrong <guangrong.xiao@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@...ux.intel.com>,
        Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
Cc:     Yumei Huang <yuhuang@...hat.com>, KVM <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org" <linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org>,
        "qemu-devel@...gnu.org" <qemu-devel@...gnu.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux ACPI <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
        Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: DAX can not work on virtual nvdimm device


Hi Ross,

Sorry for the delay, i just returned back from KVM Forum.

On 08/20/2016 02:30 AM, Ross Zwisler wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 07:59:29AM -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
>> On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 4:19 AM, Xiao Guangrong
>> <guangrong.xiao@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Dan,
>>>
>>> Recently, Redhat reported that nvml test suite failed on QEMU/KVM,
>>> more detailed info please refer to:
>>>    https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1365721
>>>
>>> The reason for this bug is that the memory region created by mmap()
>>> on the dax-based file was gone so that the region can not be found
>>> in /proc/self/smaps during the runtime.
>>>
>>> This is a simple way to trigger this issue:
>>>    mount -o dax /dev/pmem0 /mnt/pmem/
>>>    vim /mnt/pmem/xxx
>>> then 'vim' is crashed due to segment fault.
>>>
>>> This bug can be reproduced on your tree, the top commit is
>>> 10d7902fa0e82b (dax: unmap/truncate on device shutdown), the kernel
>>> configure file is attached.
>>>
>>> Your thought or comment is highly appreciated.
>>
>> I'm going to be offline until Tuesday, but I will investigate when I'm
>> back.  In the meantime if Ross or Vishal had an opportunity to take a
>> look I wouldn't say "no" :).
>
> I haven't been able to reproduce this vim segfault.  I'm using QEMU v2.6.0,
> and the kernel commit you mentioned, and your kernel config.
>
> Here's my QEMU command line:
>
> sudo ~/qemu/bin/qemu-system-x86_64 /var/lib/libvirt/images/alara.qcow2 \
> -machine pc,nvdimm -m 8G,maxmem=100G,slots=100  -object \
> memory-backend-file,id=mem1,share,mem-path=/dev/pmem0,size=8G -device \
> nvdimm,memdev=mem1,id=nv1 -smp 6 -machine pc,accel=kvm
>
> With this I'm able to mkfs the guest's /dev/pmem0, mount it with -o dax, and
> write a file with vim.

Thanks for your test. That's strange...

>
> Can you reproduce your results with a pmem device created via a memmap kernel
> command line parameter in the guest?  You'll need to update your kernel
> config to enable CONFIG_X86_PMEM_LEGACY and CONFIG_X86_PMEM_LEGACY_DEVICE.
>

Okay, i tested it with mmap=6G!10G, it failed too. So it looks like it's a
filesystem or DAX issue.

More precisely, i figured out the root case that read() returns a wrong value
when it reaches the end of the file, following test case can trigger it:

#include <stdlib.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include <fcntl.h>
#include <sys/types.h>
#include <sys/stat.h>

int main(int argc, char *argv[])
{
	char *filename;

	if (argc < 2) {
		printf("arg: filename.\n");
		return -1;
	}

	filename = argv[1];
	printf("test on %s.\n", filename);

	int fd = open(filename, O_RDWR);

	if (fd < 0) {
		perror("open");
		return -1;
	}

	int count = 0;

	while (1) {
		ssize_t ret;
		char buf;

		ret = read(fd, &buf, sizeof(buf));
		if (ret < 0) {
			perror("READ");
			return -1;
		}

		if (ret == 0)
			break;
		if (ret != sizeof(buf)) {
			printf("Count %x Ret %lx sizeof(buf) %lx.\n",
				count, ret, sizeof(buf));
			return -1;
		}

		count++;
		printf("%c", buf);
	}

	printf("\n Good Read.\n");
	return 0;
}



It will fail at "ret != sizeof(buf)", for example, the error output on my
test env is:
       Count 1000 Ret 22f84200 sizeof(buf) 1.