[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1472464553-9922-1-git-send-email-jlee@suse.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2016 17:55:53 +0800
From: "Lee, Chun-Yi" <joeyli.kernel@...il.com>
To: Darren Hart <dvhart@...radead.org>
Cc: platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Lee, Chun-Yi" <jlee@...e.com>,
Bjørn Mork <bjorn@...k.no>
Subject: [PATCH] acer-wmi: only supports AMW0_GUID1 on acer family
The AMW0_GUID1 wmi is not only found on Acer family but also other
machines like Lenovo, Fujitsu and Medion. In the past days, acer-wmi
driver handled those non-Acer machines by quirks list.
But actually acer-wmi driver was loaded on any machines that have
AMW0_GUID1. This behavior is strange because those machines should
be supported by appropriate wmi drivers. e.g. fujitsu-laptop,
ideapad-laptop.
So, This patch adds the logic to check the machine that has AMW0_GUID1
should be in Acer/Packard Bell/Gateway white list. But, it still keeps
the quirk list of those supported non-acer machines for backward
compatible.
Cc: Bjørn Mork <bjorn@...k.no>
Cc: Darren Hart <dvhart@...radead.org>
Signed-off-by: Lee, Chun-Yi <jlee@...e.com>
---
drivers/platform/x86/acer-wmi.c | 56 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 56 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/acer-wmi.c b/drivers/platform/x86/acer-wmi.c
index 3bb3162..734f0da 100644
--- a/drivers/platform/x86/acer-wmi.c
+++ b/drivers/platform/x86/acer-wmi.c
@@ -355,6 +355,32 @@ static const struct dmi_system_id acer_blacklist[] __initconst = {
{}
};
+static const struct dmi_system_id amw0_whitelist[] __initconst = {
+ {
+ .ident = "Acer",
+ .matches = {
+ DMI_MATCH(DMI_SYS_VENDOR, "Acer"),
+ },
+ },
+ {
+ .ident = "Gateway",
+ .matches = {
+ DMI_MATCH(DMI_SYS_VENDOR, "Gateway"),
+ },
+ },
+ {
+ .ident = "Packard Bell",
+ .matches = {
+ DMI_MATCH(DMI_SYS_VENDOR, "Packard Bell"),
+ },
+ },
+ {}
+};
+
+/*
+ * This quirk table is only for Acer/Gateway/Packard Bell family
+ * that those machines are supported by acer-wmi driver.
+ */
static const struct dmi_system_id acer_quirks[] __initconst = {
{
.callback = dmi_matched,
@@ -464,6 +490,17 @@ static const struct dmi_system_id acer_quirks[] __initconst = {
},
.driver_data = &quirk_acer_travelmate_2490,
},
+ {}
+};
+
+/*
+ * This quirk list is for those non-acer machines that have AMW0_GUID1
+ * but supported by acer-wmi in past days. Keeping this quirk list here
+ * is only for backward compatible. Please do not add new machine to
+ * here anymore. Those non-acer machines should be supported by
+ * appropriate wmi drivers.
+ */
+static const struct dmi_system_id non_acer_quirks[] __initconst = {
{
.callback = dmi_matched,
.ident = "Fujitsu Siemens Amilo Li 1718",
@@ -598,6 +635,7 @@ static void __init find_quirks(void)
{
if (!force_series) {
dmi_check_system(acer_quirks);
+ dmi_check_system(non_acer_quirks);
} else if (force_series == 2490) {
quirks = &quirk_acer_travelmate_2490;
}
@@ -2121,6 +2159,24 @@ static int __init acer_wmi_init(void)
find_quirks();
/*
+ * The AMW0_GUID1 wmi is not only found on Acer family but also other
+ * machines like Lenovo, Fujitsu and Medion. In the past days,
+ * acer-wmi driver handled those non-Acer machines by quirks list.
+ * But actually acer-wmi driver was loaded on any machines that have
+ * AMW0_GUID1. This behavior is strange because those machines should
+ * be supported by appropriate wmi drivers. e.g. fujitsu-laptop,
+ * ideapad-laptop. So, here checks the machine that has AMW0_GUID1
+ * should be in Acer/Gateway/Packard Bell white list, or it's already
+ * in the past quirk list.
+ */
+ if (wmi_has_guid(AMW0_GUID1) &&
+ !dmi_check_system(amw0_whitelist) &&
+ quirks == &quirk_unknown) {
+ pr_err("Unsupported machine has AMW0_GUID1, unable to load\n");
+ return -ENODEV;
+ }
+
+ /*
* Detect which ACPI-WMI interface we're using.
*/
if (wmi_has_guid(AMW0_GUID1) && wmi_has_guid(WMID_GUID1))
--
2.1.4
Powered by blists - more mailing lists