linux-kernel - Ping: [PATCH v15 00/13] support "task

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <d00bbe64-6e2c-51ce-1dfb-72ef1c4a04fa@mellanox.com>
Date:   Mon, 29 Aug 2016 12:27:06 -0400
From:   Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@...lanox.com>
To:     Gilad Ben Yossef <giladb@...lanox.com>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        "Rik van Riel" <riel@...hat.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
        Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
        Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
        Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
        "Francis Giraldeau" <francis.giraldeau@...il.com>,
        <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Ping: [PATCH v15 00/13] support "task_isolation" mode

On 8/16/2016 5:19 PM, Chris Metcalf wrote:
> Here is a respin of the task-isolation patch set.
>
> Again, I have been getting email asking me when and where this patch
> will be upstreamed so folks can start using it.  I had been thinking
> the obvious path was via Frederic Weisbecker to Ingo as a NOHZ kind of
> thing.  But perhaps it touches enough other subsystems that that
> doesn't really make sense?  Andrew, would it make sense to take it
> directly via your tree?  Frederic, Ingo, what do you think?

Ping!

No concerns have been raised yet with the v15 version of the patch series
in the two weeks since I posted it, and I think I have addressed all
previously-raised concerns (or perhaps people have just given up arguing
with me).

I did add Catalin's Reviewed-by to 08/13 (thanks!) and updated my
kernel.org repo.

Does this feel like something we can merge when the 4.9 merge window opens?
If so, whose tree is best suited for it?  Or should I ask Stephen to put it into
linux-next now and then ask Linus to merge it directly?  I recall Ingo thought
this was a bad idea when I suggested it back in January, but I'm not sure where
we got to in terms of a better approach.

Thanks all!

-- 
Chris Metcalf, Mellanox Technologies
http://www.mellanox.com