[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9c17ea4e-780e-2e1b-4c97-40399c8e3086@osg.samsung.com>
Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2016 14:40:52 +0200
From: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@....samsung.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Kukjin Kim <kgene@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@...il.com>,
Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@...sung.com>,
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/9] ARM: dts: exynos: Use macros for GPIO to make it more
readable
Hello Krzysztof,
On 08/31/2016 02:13 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Example:
> - samsung,pin-function = <0x2>;
> - samsung,pin-pud = <0>;
> - samsung,pin-drv = <0>;
> + samsung,pin-function = <PIN_FUNC_SPC_2>;
> + samsung,pin-pud = <PIN_PULL_NONE>;
> + samsung,pin-drv = <PIN_DRV_LV1>;
>
> This should be just more readable. Especially for drive strenghts which
> are unobvious and different between some SoCs.
>
I agree that's better to have macros for these instead of using magic numbers.
For all the series:
Reviewed-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@....samsung.com>
> Tested with dtx_diff:
> for i in dts-old/exynos*dtb; do scripts/dtc/dtx_diff $i dts-new/$(basename $i); done
>
I've also tested the patches on an Exynos5800 Peach Pi board, and as expected
everything is working correctly since the compiled DTB is exactly the same.
So for patches 1/9 and 9/9:
Tested-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@....samsung.com>
Best regards,
--
Javier Martinez Canillas
Open Source Group
Samsung Research America
Powered by blists - more mailing lists