[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <xmqqlgzc24hq.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com>
Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2016 11:11:13 -0700
From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@...ox.com>
To: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc: git@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] git-send-email: Add ability to cc: any "trailers" from commit message
Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com> writes:
> On Wed, 2016-08-31 at 10:54 -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>> Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com> writes:
>>
>> >
>> > Many commits have various forms of trailers similar to
>> > "Acked-by: Name <address>" and "Reported-by: Name <address>"
>> >
>> > Add the ability to cc these trailers when using git send-email.
>> I thought you were asking what we call these "<token> followed by
>> <colon>" at the end of the log message, and "footers or trailers"
>> was the answer.
>>
>> I do not have a strong objection against limiting to "-by:" lines;
>> for one thing, it would automatically avoid having to worry about
>> "Bug-ID:" and other trailers that won't have e-mail address at all.
>>
>> But if you are _only_ picking up "-by:" lines, then calling this
>> option "trailers" is way too wide and confusing. I do not think
>> there is any specific name for "-by:" lines, though. Perhaps you
>> would need to invent some name that has "-by" as a substring.
>>
>> "any-by"? or just "by"? I dunno.
>
> Signatures?
Helped-by: and Reported-by: are often written by the author of the
patch and not by those who helped or reported, so calling them signatures
imply the author is forging them, too ;-)
I dunno.
Any name that hints that this applies only to the trailers that ends
with "-by" is fine but "Signatures-by" does not sound very
grammatical.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists