linux-kernel - cmsg newgroup alt.sex.fetish.bool (was Re: [PATCH] arch: all: include: asm: bitops: Use bool instead of int for all bit test functions)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20160901204348.GQ2356@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Date:   Thu, 1 Sep 2016 21:43:49 +0100
From:   Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
To:     Chen Gang <chengang@...ndsoft.com.cn>
Cc:     Vineet Gupta <vgupta@...opsys.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, minchan@...nel.org, vbabka@...e.cz,
        gi-oh.kim@...fitbricks.com, iamjoonsoo.kim@....com,
        hillf.zj@...baba-inc.com, mgorman@...hsingularity.net,
        mhocko@...e.com, rientjes@...gle.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        rth@...ddle.net, ink@...assic.park.msu.ru, mattst88@...il.com,
        linux@...linux.org.uk, catalin.marinas@....com,
        will.deacon@....com, hskinnemoen@...il.com, egtvedt@...fundet.no,
        realmz6@...il.com, ysato@...rs.sourceforge.jp, rkuo@...eaurora.org,
        tony.luck@...el.com, fenghua.yu@...el.com, geert@...ux-m68k.org,
        james.hogan@...tec.com, ralf@...ux-mips.org, dhowells@...hat.com,
        deller@....de, benh@...nel.crashing.org, paulus@...ba.org,
        mpe@...erman.id.au, schwidefsky@...ibm.com,
        heiko.carstens@...ibm.com, dalias@...c.org,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: cmsg newgroup alt.sex.fetish.bool (was Re: [PATCH] arch: all:
 include: asm: bitops: Use bool instead of int for all bit test functions)

On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 05:49:05AM +0800, Chen Gang wrote:

> Could you provide the related proof?
> 
> Or shall I try to analyze about it and get proof?

Can you show a proof that it actually improves anything?  He who proposes
a patch gets to defend it, not the other way round...

Al, bloody annoyed