[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87h99zdxwm.fsf@yhuang-mobile.sh.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 01 Sep 2016 16:04:57 -0700
From: "Huang\, Ying" <ying.huang@...el.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: "Huang\, Ying" <ying.huang@...el.com>, <tim.c.chen@...el.com>,
<dave.hansen@...el.com>, <andi.kleen@...el.com>,
<aaron.lu@...el.com>, <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
Shaohua Li <shli@...nel.org>, Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -v2 01/10] swap: Change SWAPFILE_CLUSTER to 512
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> writes:
> On Thu, 1 Sep 2016 08:16:54 -0700 "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@...el.com> wrote:
>
>> From: Huang Ying <ying.huang@...el.com>
>>
>> In this patch, the size of the swap cluster is changed to that of the
>> THP (Transparent Huge Page) on x86_64 architecture (512). This is for
>> the THP swap support on x86_64. Where one swap cluster will be used to
>> hold the contents of each THP swapped out. And some information of the
>> swapped out THP (such as compound map count) will be recorded in the
>> swap_cluster_info data structure.
>>
>> In effect, this will enlarge swap cluster size by 2 times. Which may
>> make it harder to find a free cluster when the swap space becomes
>> fragmented. So that, this may reduce the continuous swap space
>> allocation and sequential write in theory. The performance test in 0day
>> show no regressions caused by this.
>>
>> --- a/mm/swapfile.c
>> +++ b/mm/swapfile.c
>> @@ -196,7 +196,7 @@ static void discard_swap_cluster(struct swap_info_struct *si,
>> }
>> }
>>
>> -#define SWAPFILE_CLUSTER 256
>> +#define SWAPFILE_CLUSTER 512
>> #define LATENCY_LIMIT 256
>>
>
> What happens to architectures which have different HPAGE_SIZE and/or
> PAGE_SIZE?
For the architecture with HPAGE_SIZE / PAGE_SIZE == 512 (for example
x86_64), the huge page swap optimizing will be turned on. For other
architectures, it will be turned off as before.
This mostly because I don't know whether it is a good idea to turn on
THP swap optimizing for the architectures other than x86_64. For
example, it appears that the huge page size is 8M (1<<23) on SPARC. But
I don't know whether 8M is too big for a swap cluster. And it appears
that the huge page size could be as large as 512M on MIPS.
Best Regards,
Huang, Ying
Powered by blists - more mailing lists