[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20160902133016.0a150c880174fa97f161912f@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2016 13:30:16 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: "Huang\, Ying" <ying.huang@...el.com>
Cc: <tim.c.chen@...el.com>, <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
<andi.kleen@...el.com>, <aaron.lu@...el.com>, <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
Shaohua Li <shli@...nel.org>, Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -v2 01/10] swap: Change SWAPFILE_CLUSTER to 512
On Thu, 01 Sep 2016 16:04:57 -0700 "Huang\, Ying" <ying.huang@...el.com> wrote:
> >> }
> >>
> >> -#define SWAPFILE_CLUSTER 256
> >> +#define SWAPFILE_CLUSTER 512
> >> #define LATENCY_LIMIT 256
> >>
> >
> > What happens to architectures which have different HPAGE_SIZE and/or
> > PAGE_SIZE?
>
> For the architecture with HPAGE_SIZE / PAGE_SIZE == 512 (for example
> x86_64), the huge page swap optimizing will be turned on. For other
> architectures, it will be turned off as before.
>
> This mostly because I don't know whether it is a good idea to turn on
> THP swap optimizing for the architectures other than x86_64. For
> example, it appears that the huge page size is 8M (1<<23) on SPARC. But
> I don't know whether 8M is too big for a swap cluster. And it appears
> that the huge page size could be as large as 512M on MIPS.
This doesn't sounds very organized. If some architecture with some
config happens to have HPAGE_SIZE / PAGE_SIZE == 512 then the feature
will be turned on; otherwise it will be turned off. Nobody will even
notice that it happened.
Would it not be better to do
#ifdef CONFIG_SOMETHING
#define SWAPFILE_CLUSTER (HPAGE_SIZE / PAGE_SIZE)
#else
#define SWAPFILE_CLUSTER 256
#endif
and, by using CONFIG_SOMETHING in the other appropriate places, enable
the feature in the usual fashion?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists