linux-kernel - Re: sparc: bpf_jit: Rename jump labels in bpf_jit

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sun, 04 Sep 2016 00:32:21 -0700 (PDT)
From:   David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:     elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net
Cc:     daniel@...earbox.net, sparclinux@...r.kernel.org,
        adam.buchbinder@...il.com, ast@...nel.org, rabin@....in,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
        julia.lawall@...6.fr, pbonzini@...hat.com,
        linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, jdelvare@...e.de
Subject: Re: sparc: bpf_jit: Rename jump labels in bpf_jit_compile()

From: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
Date: Sun, 4 Sep 2016 09:20:55 +0200

> I guess that I will stumble on more software improvement opportunities
> you find harder to become comfortable with.

Improvement is a matter of opinion.  So your statement assumes that
your changes are an improvement, and everyone in this thread clearly
disagrees with that.

This is why everything you are doing here is so irritating.

It's not because I find improvements "uncomfortable", but rather it's
because your changes are not seen as improvements in the first place.