linux-kernel - Re: sparc: bpf_jit: Rename jump labels in bpf_jit

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <24817d27-2e33-2c6d-c439-032e9241d832@users.sourceforge.net>
Date:   Sun, 4 Sep 2016 09:40:07 +0200
From:   SF Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
To:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:     Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>, sparclinux@...r.kernel.org,
        Adam Buchbinder <adam.buchbinder@...il.com>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Rabin Vincent <rabin@....in>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
        Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
        Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.de>
Subject: Re: sparc: bpf_jit: Rename jump labels in bpf_jit_compile()

> It's not because I find improvements "uncomfortable", but rather it's
> because your changes are not seen as improvements in the first place.

What is your software development opinion for the update step
"[1/4] sparc: bpf_jit: Use kmalloc_array() in bpf_jit_compile()"
from this small patch series?

Regards,
Markus