[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160905101937.GY10153@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2016 12:19:37 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: kbuild test robot <lkp@...el.com>
Cc: kbuild-all@...org, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Paul McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
Subject: Re: Question on smp_mb__before_spinlock
On Mon, Sep 05, 2016 at 05:56:46PM +0800, kbuild test robot wrote:
> Hi Peter,
>
> [auto build test ERROR on linus/master]
> [also build test ERROR on v4.8-rc5 next-20160825]
> [if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help improve the system]
> [Suggest to use git(>=2.9.0) format-patch --base=<commit> (or --base=auto for convenience) to record what (public, well-known) commit your patch series was built on]
> [Check https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch for more information]
What happend to not applying patches that lack a SoB and the subject
doesn't even include [PATCH] either.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists