[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160905112636.s4sol2r4vyo5lxo5@wfg-t540p.sh.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2016 19:26:36 +0800
From: Fengguang Wu <lkp@...el.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: kbuild-all@...org, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Paul McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
Subject: Re: Question on smp_mb__before_spinlock
Hi Peter,
On Mon, Sep 05, 2016 at 12:19:37PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>On Mon, Sep 05, 2016 at 05:56:46PM +0800, kbuild test robot wrote:
>> Hi Peter,
>>
>> [auto build test ERROR on linus/master]
>> [also build test ERROR on v4.8-rc5 next-20160825]
>> [if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help improve the system]
>> [Suggest to use git(>=2.9.0) format-patch --base=<commit> (or --base=auto for convenience) to record what (public, well-known) commit your patch series was built on]
>> [Check https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch for more information]
>
>What happend to not applying patches that lack a SoB and the subject
>doesn't even include [PATCH] either.
Sorry the current logic assumes "Re: " in subject. Just fixed it to
ignore all patches w/o SOB.
Regards,
Fengguang
Powered by blists - more mailing lists