linux-kernel - Re: Question on smp_mb__before

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 5 Sep 2016 19:26:36 +0800
From:   Fengguang Wu <lkp@...el.com>
To:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:     kbuild-all@...org, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
        Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
        Paul McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
        Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
Subject: Re: Question on smp_mb__before_spinlock

Hi Peter,

On Mon, Sep 05, 2016 at 12:19:37PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>On Mon, Sep 05, 2016 at 05:56:46PM +0800, kbuild test robot wrote:
>> Hi Peter,
>>
>> [auto build test ERROR on linus/master]
>> [also build test ERROR on v4.8-rc5 next-20160825]
>> [if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help improve the system]
>> [Suggest to use git(>=2.9.0) format-patch --base=<commit> (or --base=auto for convenience) to record what (public, well-known) commit your patch series was built on]
>> [Check https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch for more information]
>
>What happend to not applying patches that lack a SoB and the subject
>doesn't even include [PATCH] either.

Sorry the current logic assumes "Re: " in subject. Just fixed it to
ignore all patches w/o SOB.

Regards,
Fengguang