lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <57CD6D9F.20502@denx.de>
Date:   Mon, 5 Sep 2016 15:05:35 +0200
From:   Heiko Schocher <hs@...x.de>
To:     Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>
Cc:     Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>, linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org,
        Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@...il.com>,
        Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ubifs: compress lines for immediate return

Hello Masahiro,

Am 05.09.2016 um 14:44 schrieb Masahiro Yamada:
> Hi Heiko, Richard,
>
>
>
>
> 2016-09-05 15:54 GMT+09:00 Heiko Schocher <hs@...x.de>:
>> From: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>
>>
>> Cleanup the following code construct:
>> ret = expression;
>> if (ret)
>>          return ret;
>> return 0;
>>
>> into a simple form:
>> return expression;
>>
>> From: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>
>> posted on the U-Boot mailinglist.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Heiko Schocher <hs@...x.de>
>
>
>
> I am the author of the original patch in the U-Boot ML.
>
> Please notice it has not passed the review in U-Boot ML yet.
> Actually, I got some feedback against this patch.
>
> See
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/665199/
>
> Stephan Warren suggested that
> we should not break code uniformity.
>
>
> After I considered it and took a closer look,
> I decided that we should not do these changes.
>
>
> This patch breaks the code uniformity.
> See blow:
>
>
>
>
>>   /**
>> diff --git a/fs/ubifs/gc.c b/fs/ubifs/gc.c
>> index 821b348..88cd61d 100644
>> --- a/fs/ubifs/gc.c
>> +++ b/fs/ubifs/gc.c
>> @@ -297,10 +297,8 @@ static int sort_nodes(struct ubifs_info *c, struct ubifs_scan_leb *sleb,
>>          err = dbg_check_data_nodes_order(c, &sleb->nodes);
>>          if (err)
>>                  return err;
>> -       err = dbg_check_nondata_nodes_order(c, nondata);
>> -       if (err)
>> -               return err;
>> -       return 0;
>> +
>> +       return dbg_check_nondata_nodes_order(c, nondata);
>>   }
>
> Original code has uniformity here.
>
>
> err = dbg_check_data_nodes_order(c, &sleb->nodes);
> if (err)
>         return err;
> err = dbg_check_nondata_nodes_order(c, nondata);
> if (err)
>         return err;
>
>
>
>>   /**
>> diff --git a/fs/ubifs/lpt_commit.c b/fs/ubifs/lpt_commit.c
>> index ce89bdc..79a8e96 100644
>> --- a/fs/ubifs/lpt_commit.c
>> +++ b/fs/ubifs/lpt_commit.c
>> @@ -313,10 +313,7 @@ static int layout_cnodes(struct ubifs_info *c)
>>          alen = ALIGN(offs, c->min_io_size);
>>          upd_ltab(c, lnum, c->leb_size - alen, alen - offs);
>>          dbg_chk_lpt_sz(c, 4, alen - offs);
>> -       err = dbg_chk_lpt_sz(c, 3, alen);
>> -       if (err)
>> -               return err;
>> -       return 0;
>> +       return dbg_chk_lpt_sz(c, 3, alen);
>>
>
> We have dbg_chk_lpt_sz() call just above  (its return value is ignored)
>
> So, returning the value of the last dbg_chk_lpt_sz() call
> seems a bit weird.  So, I do not want to touch this.
>
>
>
>
> Heiko,
> If you want to post this patch, it is up to you.
> But, in that case, could you drop my Author and Signed-off-by,
> then send it as your patch, please?
>
> I do not feel comfortable with my authorship
> for what I decided to not do.
>
>
> I will retract my original patch from the U-Boot ML, too.

Oh, then I was a little to fast ... sorry.

@Richard: Should we just forget this patch?

bye,
Heiko
-- 
DENX Software Engineering GmbH,      Managing Director: Wolfgang Denk
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ