linux-kernel - Re: [Question] about patch: don't use [delayed_]work

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20160905141406.GA6430@rhlx01.hs-esslingen.de>
Date:   Mon, 5 Sep 2016 16:14:06 +0200
From:   Andreas Mohr <andi@...as.de>
To:     Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc:     Andreas Mohr <andi@...as.de>, Qiao Zhou <qiaozhou@...micro.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Question] about patch: don't use [delayed_]work_pending()

On Mon, Sep 05, 2016 at 08:41:39AM -0400, Tejun Heo wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 04, 2016 at 03:29:39AM +0200, Andreas Mohr wrote:
> > Reason: any other [early-boot] invoker of cancel_delayed_work_sync()
> > would hit the same issue,
> > without any fix then available locally each.
> > 
> > This may or may not be intentional.
> > Just wanted to point it out.
> 
> idk, invoking a blocking API from early boot is pretty special (as
> with everything during early boot), so I think it's fine to handle
> them as execeptions.

Yup, this sounds like the rationale that I would have expected.

Andreas