[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160905193111.GC4728@lukather>
Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2016 21:31:11 +0200
From: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>
To: wens@...e.org, Jorik Jonker <jorik@...pendief.biz>
Cc: robh+dt@...nel.org, mark.rutland@....com, linux@...linux.org.uk,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/7] dts: sun8i-h3: add UART1-3 to Orange Pi Plus
Hi Jorik,
On Sat, Sep 03, 2016 at 02:09:32PM +0200, Jorik Jonker wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 02, 2016 at 09:04:25AM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> >Unfortunately, these pins can be used for other purposes as well, so
> >we cannot make force that decision down to our users.
>
> Yes, but since the associated peripheral is disabled, the users are free to
> configure other functions/peripherals, right? I mean something like this in
> pseudo-DT:
>
> /soc/pio: pinctrl@...20800/uart1_pins:
> allwinner,pins = "PG6, PG7";
> /soc/pio: pinctrl@...20800/foo0_pins:
> allwinner,pins = "PG6, PG7";
> ..
> /soc/uart1: serial@...ial@...28400:
> pinctrl-0 = <&uart1_pins>;
> status = "disabled";
> /soc/bar:
> pinctrl-0 = <&uart1_pins>;
> status = "disabled";
>
> Assuming Linux/DT allows this, this would force nothing, only offer choice
> and ease of use.
Hmm, sorry, I went over your patches too quickly...
That's a great compromise I think. Chen-Yu, any opinion on this?
Thanks,
Maxime
--
Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (820 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists