linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v7 4/9] drm/mediatek: update display module connections

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1473147546.11736.7.camel@mtksdaap41>
Date:   Tue, 6 Sep 2016 15:39:06 +0800
From:   CK Hu <ck.hu@...iatek.com>
To:     YT Shen <yt.shen@...iatek.com>
CC:     <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
        David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
        Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
        Daniel Kurtz <djkurtz@...omium.org>,
        Mao Huang <littlecvr@...omium.org>,
        Bibby Hsieh <bibby.hsieh@...iatek.com>,
        "Daniel Vetter" <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>,
        Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
        Jie Qiu <jie.qiu@...iatek.com>,
        Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>,
        Chris Wilson <chris@...is-wilson.co.uk>,
        shaoming chen <shaoming.chen@...iatek.com>,
        Jitao Shi <jitao.shi@...iatek.com>,
        Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>,
        Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <srv_heupstream@...iatek.com>,
        Sascha Hauer <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
        <yingjoe.chen@...iatek.com>, <emil.l.velikov@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 4/9] drm/mediatek: update display module connections

Hi, YT:

On Fri, 2016-09-02 at 19:24 +0800, YT Shen wrote:
> update connections for OVL, RDMA, BLS, DSI
> 
> Signed-off-by: YT Shen <yt.shen@...iatek.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_ddp.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 25 insertions(+)
> 

[snip...]

> @@ -111,6 +119,9 @@ static unsigned int mtk_ddp_mout_en(enum mtk_ddp_comp_id cur,
>  	if (cur == DDP_COMPONENT_OVL0 && next == DDP_COMPONENT_COLOR0) {
>  		*addr = DISP_REG_CONFIG_DISP_OVL0_MOUT_EN;
>  		value = OVL0_MOUT_EN_COLOR0;
> +	} else if (cur == DDP_COMPONENT_OVL0 && next == DDP_COMPONENT_RDMA0) {
> +		*addr = DISP_REG_CONFIG_DISP_OVL_MOUT_EN;
> +		value = OVL_MOUT_EN_RDMA;
>  	} else if (cur == DDP_COMPONENT_OD && next == DDP_COMPONENT_RDMA0) {
>  		*addr = DISP_REG_CONFIG_DISP_OD_MOUT_EN;
>  		value = OD_MOUT_EN_RDMA0;
> @@ -148,6 +159,9 @@ static unsigned int mtk_ddp_sel_in(enum mtk_ddp_comp_id cur,
>  	} else if (cur == DDP_COMPONENT_OVL1 && next == DDP_COMPONENT_COLOR1) {
>  		*addr = DISP_REG_CONFIG_DISP_COLOR1_SEL_IN;
>  		value = COLOR1_SEL_IN_OVL1;
> +	} else if (cur == DDP_COMPONENT_BLS && next == DDP_COMPONENT_DSI0) {

DDP_COMPONENT_BLS is a new symbol which is defined in 9th patch of this
series. I think the definition of DDP_COMPONENT_BLS should be in front
of this patch.

> +		*addr = DISP_REG_CONFIG_DSI_SEL;
> +		value = DSI_SEL_IN_BLS;
>  	} else {
>  		value = 0;
>  	}
> @@ -155,6 +169,15 @@ static unsigned int mtk_ddp_sel_in(enum mtk_ddp_comp_id cur,
>  	return value;
>  }
>  

Regards,
CK