[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1473212348.11736.16.camel@mtksdaap41>
Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2016 09:39:08 +0800
From: CK Hu <ck.hu@...iatek.com>
To: YT Shen <yt.shen@...iatek.com>
CC: <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
Daniel Kurtz <djkurtz@...omium.org>,
Mao Huang <littlecvr@...omium.org>,
Bibby Hsieh <bibby.hsieh@...iatek.com>,
"Daniel Vetter" <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Jie Qiu <jie.qiu@...iatek.com>,
Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>,
Chris Wilson <chris@...is-wilson.co.uk>,
shaoming chen <shaoming.chen@...iatek.com>,
Jitao Shi <jitao.shi@...iatek.com>,
Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>,
Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <srv_heupstream@...iatek.com>,
Sascha Hauer <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
<yingjoe.chen@...iatek.com>, <emil.l.velikov@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 6/9] drm/mediatek: add dsi interrupt control
Hi, YT:
On Fri, 2016-09-02 at 19:24 +0800, YT Shen wrote:
> From: shaoming chen <shaoming.chen@...iatek.com>
>
> add dsi interrupt control
>
> Signed-off-by: shaoming chen <shaoming.chen@...iatek.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dsi.c | 76 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 76 insertions(+)
>
[snip...]
>
> +static wait_queue_head_t _dsi_irq_wait_queue;
I think it's better to move this global variable into platform driver
data. Maybe one day you have two dsi device and one global variable is
not enough.
> +
[snip...]
> +
> +static irqreturn_t mtk_dsi_irq(int irq, void *dev_id)
> +{
> + struct mtk_dsi *dsi = dev_id;
> + u32 status, tmp;
> + u32 flag = LPRX_RD_RDY_INT_FLAG | CMD_DONE_INT_FLAG | VM_DONE_INT_FLAG;
> +
> + status = readl(dsi->regs + DSI_INTSTA);
If you define as
status = readl(dsi->regs + DSI_INTSTA) & flag;
You can remove 'flag' in below statements and reduce code size.
> +
> + if (status & flag) {
> + do {
> + mtk_dsi_mask(dsi, DSI_RACK, RACK, RACK);
> + tmp = readl(dsi->regs + DSI_INTSTA);
> + } while (tmp & DSI_BUSY);
> +
> + mtk_dsi_mask(dsi, DSI_INTSTA, status & flag, 0);
> + mtk_dsi_irq_data_set(dsi, status & flag);
> + wake_up_interruptible(&_dsi_irq_wait_queue);
> + }
> +
> + return IRQ_HANDLED;
> +}
> +
[snip...]
>
> @@ -869,8 +926,27 @@ static int mtk_dsi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> return ret;
> }
>
> + irq_num = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
> + if (irq_num < 0) {
> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to request dsi irq resource\n");
> + return -EPROBE_DEFER;
> + }
> +
> + irq_set_status_flags(irq_num, IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW);
> + ret = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev, irq_num, mtk_dsi_irq,
> + IRQF_TRIGGER_LOW, dev_name(&pdev->dev), dsi);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to request mediatek dsi irq\n");
> + return -EPROBE_DEFER;
> + }
> +
> + dsi->irq_data = 0;
You use devm_kzalloc() to allocate 'dsi', so this statement is
redundant.
> + dev_info(dev, "dsi irq num is 0x%x\n", irq_num);
> +
> platform_set_drvdata(pdev, dsi);
>
> + init_waitqueue_head(&_dsi_irq_wait_queue);
> +
> return component_add(&pdev->dev, &mtk_dsi_component_ops);
> }
Regards,
CK
Powered by blists - more mailing lists