linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V10 7/8] irqchip/gicv3-its: Factor out PCI-MSI part that might be reused for ACPI

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1609061149090.5647@nanos>
Date:   Tue, 6 Sep 2016 11:50:17 +0200 (CEST)
From:   Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To:     Tomasz Nowicki <tn@...ihalf.com>
cc:     marc.zyngier@....com, jason@...edaemon.net, rjw@...ysocki.net,
        helgaas@...nel.org, rafael@...nel.org, Lorenzo.Pieralisi@....com,
        will.deacon@....com, catalin.marinas@....com,
        hanjun.guo@...aro.org, shijie.huang@....com,
        robert.richter@...iumnetworks.com, mw@...ihalf.com,
        linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linaro-acpi@...ts.linaro.org, andrea.gallo@...aro.org,
        linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        al.stone@...aro.org, graeme.gregory@...aro.org,
        ddaney.cavm@...il.com, okaya@...eaurora.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V10 7/8] irqchip/gicv3-its: Factor out PCI-MSI part that
 might be reused for ACPI

On Tue, 6 Sep 2016, Tomasz Nowicki wrote:
> -static int __init its_pci_msi_init(void)
> +static int __init its_pci_msi_init_one(struct fwnode_handle *handle,
> +				       const char *name)
>  {
> -	struct device_node *np;
>  	struct irq_domain *parent;
>  
> +	parent = irq_find_matching_fwnode(handle, DOMAIN_BUS_NEXUS);
> +	if (!parent || !msi_get_domain_info(parent)) {
> +		pr_err("%s: Unable to locate ITS domain\n", name);
> +		return -ENXIO;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (!pci_msi_create_irq_domain(handle, &its_pci_msi_domain_info,
> +				       parent)) {
> +		pr_err("%s: Unable to create PCI domain\n", name);
> +		return -ENOMEM;

So you have error codes here.

> +	}
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int __init its_pci_of_msi_init(void)
> +{
> +	struct device_node *np;
> +
>  	for (np = of_find_matching_node(NULL, its_device_id); np;
>  	     np = of_find_matching_node(np, its_device_id)) {
>  		if (!of_property_read_bool(np, "msi-controller"))
>  			continue;
>  
> -		parent = irq_find_matching_host(np, DOMAIN_BUS_NEXUS);
> -		if (!parent || !msi_get_domain_info(parent)) {
> -			pr_err("%s: unable to locate ITS domain\n",
> -			       np->full_name);
> +		if (its_pci_msi_init_one(of_node_to_fwnode(np), np->full_name))
>  			continue;
> -		}
> -
> -		if (!pci_msi_create_irq_domain(of_node_to_fwnode(np),
> -					       &its_pci_msi_domain_info,
> -					       parent)) {
> -			pr_err("%s: unable to create PCI domain\n",
> -			       np->full_name);
> -			continue;
> -		}
>  
>  		pr_info("PCI/MSI: %s domain created\n", np->full_name);
>  	}
>  
>  	return 0;

And no matter what you return success

>  }
> +
> +static int __init its_pci_msi_init(void)
> +{
> +	its_pci_of_msi_init();

Which you subsequently ignore here. What's the point?

Thanks,

	tglx