linux-kernel - bcache vs bcachefs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87wpip9x8r.fsf@sylvester.afaics.de>
Date:   Tue, 06 Sep 2016 11:46:28 +0200
From:   Harald Dunkel <harri@...ics.de>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: bcache vs bcachefs

Hi folks,

I am pretty hesitant replacing the rock-solid ext4 by bcachefs on my servers.
Meaning no offense, but surely I would prefer to have ext4 with a thin "SSD
caching layer" over a completely different filesystem, potentially with alot
of teething troubles.

Question: Is bcache EOL or can I rely on it for the next 5 to 10 years?

Regards
Harri