[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5db4d7db-b1f4-c6af-de56-e8bb13ebc465@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2016 15:03:43 +0300
From: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>
To: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
Nicolin Chen <nicoleotsuka@...il.com>, vinod.koul@...el.com
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org,
dmaengine@...r.kernel.org, gnurou@...il.com,
thierry.reding@...il.com, swarren@...dotorg.org,
ldewangan@...dia.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] Add memcpy support for tegra210-adma
On 06.09.2016 14:33, Jon Hunter wrote:
>
> On 03/09/16 01:32, Nicolin Chen wrote:
>> This series of patches add memcpy support for tegra210 ADMA engine.
>
> Thanks. Any reason you choose this DMA and not the APB DMA? The APB DMA
> is more of a generic DMA and so for memcpy it would seem to be a good
> choice and it is available on all Tegras not just Tegra210.
>
Just a small clarification:
If I'm not mistaken, APB DMA is mem-to-device, while AHB DMA is mem-to-mem. So,
you probably meant AHB and not the APB.
> Furthermore, from a power standpoint the ADMA is in the audio power
> domain and so using it for memcpy would mean the audio power domain is
> turned on. It may not be a big deal for some, but given the APB is in
> the CORE domain (always on when not in low-power) it seems like a better
> choice for power as well.
>
--
Dmitry
Powered by blists - more mailing lists