linux-kernel - [PATCH 1/4] Revert "mm, oom: prevent premature OOM killer invocation for high order request"

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20160906135258.18335-2-vbabka@suse.cz>
Date:   Tue,  6 Sep 2016 15:52:55 +0200
From:   Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
To:     Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Arkadiusz Miskiewicz <a.miskiewicz@...il.com>,
        Ralf-Peter Rohbeck <Ralf-Peter.Rohbeck@...ntum.com>,
        Olaf Hering <olaf@...fle.de>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        linux-mm@...ck.org, Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
        Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>,
        Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>,
        David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
        Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
        Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] Revert "mm, oom: prevent premature OOM killer invocation for high order request"

Commit 6b4e3181d7bd ("mm, oom: prevent premature OOM killer invocation for high
order request") was intended as a quick fix of OOM regressions for 4.8 and
stable 4.7.x kernels. For a better long-term solution, we still want to
consider compaction feedback, which should be possible after some more
improvements in the following patches.

This reverts commit 6b4e3181d7bd5ca5ab6f45929e4a5ffa7ab4ab7f.

Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>
Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
---
 mm/page_alloc.c | 51 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 49 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
index ee3997859f14..1df7694f4ec7 100644
--- a/mm/page_alloc.c
+++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
@@ -3158,6 +3158,54 @@ __alloc_pages_direct_compact(gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order,
 	return NULL;
 }
 
+static inline bool
+should_compact_retry(struct alloc_context *ac, int order, int alloc_flags,
+		     enum compact_result compact_result,
+		     enum compact_priority *compact_priority,
+		     int compaction_retries)
+{
+	int max_retries = MAX_COMPACT_RETRIES;
+
+	if (!order)
+		return false;
+
+	/*
+	 * compaction considers all the zone as desperately out of memory
+	 * so it doesn't really make much sense to retry except when the
+	 * failure could be caused by insufficient priority
+	 */
+	if (compaction_failed(compact_result)) {
+		if (*compact_priority > MIN_COMPACT_PRIORITY) {
+			(*compact_priority)--;
+			return true;
+		}
+		return false;
+	}
+
+	/*
+	 * make sure the compaction wasn't deferred or didn't bail out early
+	 * due to locks contention before we declare that we should give up.
+	 * But do not retry if the given zonelist is not suitable for
+	 * compaction.
+	 */
+	if (compaction_withdrawn(compact_result))
+		return compaction_zonelist_suitable(ac, order, alloc_flags);
+
+	/*
+	 * !costly requests are much more important than __GFP_REPEAT
+	 * costly ones because they are de facto nofail and invoke OOM
+	 * killer to move on while costly can fail and users are ready
+	 * to cope with that. 1/4 retries is rather arbitrary but we
+	 * would need much more detailed feedback from compaction to
+	 * make a better decision.
+	 */
+	if (order > PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER)
+		max_retries /= 4;
+	if (compaction_retries <= max_retries)
+		return true;
+
+	return false;
+}
 #else
 static inline struct page *
 __alloc_pages_direct_compact(gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order,
@@ -3168,8 +3216,6 @@ __alloc_pages_direct_compact(gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order,
 	return NULL;
 }
 
-#endif /* CONFIG_COMPACTION */
-
 static inline bool
 should_compact_retry(struct alloc_context *ac, unsigned int order, int alloc_flags,
 		     enum compact_result compact_result,
@@ -3196,6 +3242,7 @@ should_compact_retry(struct alloc_context *ac, unsigned int order, int alloc_fla
 	}
 	return false;
 }
+#endif /* CONFIG_COMPACTION */
 
 /* Perform direct synchronous page reclaim */
 static int
-- 
2.9.3