[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160906161139.GG19605@e104818-lin.cambridge.arm.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2016 17:11:39 +0100
From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
To: Pratyush Anand <panand@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux@....linux.org.uk,
will.deacon@....com, Yang Shi <yang.shi@...aro.org>,
steve.capper@...aro.org, srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
vijaya.kumar@...iumnetworks.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
oleg@...hat.com, dave.long@...aro.org,
Sandeepa Prabhu <sandeepa.s.prabhu@...il.com>,
wcohen@...hat.com, Anna-Maria Gleixner <anna-maria@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] arm64: Handle TRAP_HWBRKPT for user mode as well
On Tue, Aug 02, 2016 at 11:00:07AM +0530, Pratyush Anand wrote:
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/debug-monitors.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/debug-monitors.c
> @@ -246,6 +246,8 @@ static void send_user_sigtrap(int si_code)
> static int single_step_handler(unsigned long addr, unsigned int esr,
> struct pt_regs *regs)
> {
> + bool handler_found = false;
> +
> /*
> * If we are stepping a pending breakpoint, call the hw_breakpoint
> * handler first.
> @@ -253,7 +255,14 @@ static int single_step_handler(unsigned long addr, unsigned int esr,
> if (!reinstall_suspended_bps(regs))
> return 0;
>
> - if (user_mode(regs)) {
> +#ifdef CONFIG_KPROBES
> + if (kprobe_single_step_handler(regs, esr) == DBG_HOOK_HANDLED)
> + handler_found = true;
> +#endif
> + if (!handler_found && call_step_hook(regs, esr) == DBG_HOOK_HANDLED)
> + handler_found = true;
> +
> + if (!handler_found && user_mode(regs)) {
> send_user_sigtrap(TRAP_HWBKPT);
Could we register kprobe_single_step_handler() via register_set_hook()
and only invoke call_step_hook() above?
--
Catalin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists