[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160906163434.GH19605@e104818-lin.cambridge.arm.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2016 17:34:34 +0100
From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
To: Pratyush Anand <panand@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux@....linux.org.uk,
will.deacon@....com, Yang Shi <yang.shi@...aro.org>,
steve.capper@...aro.org, srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
vijaya.kumar@...iumnetworks.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
oleg@...hat.com, dave.long@...aro.org,
Sandeepa Prabhu <sandeepa.s.prabhu@...il.com>,
wcohen@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] arm64: Handle TRAP_BRKPT for user mode as well
On Tue, Aug 02, 2016 at 11:00:08AM +0530, Pratyush Anand wrote:
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/debug-monitors.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/debug-monitors.c
> @@ -326,16 +326,20 @@ NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(call_break_hook);
> static int brk_handler(unsigned long addr, unsigned int esr,
> struct pt_regs *regs)
> {
> - if (user_mode(regs)) {
> - send_user_sigtrap(TRAP_BRKPT);
> - }
> + bool handler_found = false;
> +
> #ifdef CONFIG_KPROBES
> - else if ((esr & BRK64_ESR_MASK) == BRK64_ESR_KPROBES) {
> - if (kprobe_breakpoint_handler(regs, esr) != DBG_HOOK_HANDLED)
> - return -EFAULT;
> + if ((esr & BRK64_ESR_MASK) == BRK64_ESR_KPROBES) {
> + if (kprobe_breakpoint_handler(regs, esr) == DBG_HOOK_HANDLED)
> + handler_found = true;
> }
> #endif
> - else if (call_break_hook(regs, esr) != DBG_HOOK_HANDLED) {
> + if (!handler_found && call_break_hook(regs, esr) == DBG_HOOK_HANDLED)
> + handler_found = true;
> +
> + if (!handler_found && user_mode(regs)) {
> + send_user_sigtrap(TRAP_BRKPT);
> + } else if (!handler_found) {
> pr_warn("Unexpected kernel BRK exception at EL1\n");
> return -EFAULT;
> }
I think we could do the same here with a single call_break_hook() and
making sure that the corresponding handlers check the esr for the
corresponding BRK encoding.
--
Catalin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists