linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4/7] spi: meson: Add GXBB compatible

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 8 Sep 2016 09:44:57 +0200
From:   Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@...libre.com>
To:     Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
        Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@...libre.com>
Cc:     Kevin Hilman <khilman@...libre.com>,
        Carlo Caione <carlo@...one.org>,
        linux-amlogic@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-spi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/7] spi: meson: Add GXBB compatible

On 09/07/2016 08:58 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 07, 2016 at 05:13:40PM +0200, Jerome Brunet wrote:
>> From: Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@...libre.com>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@...libre.com>
>> ---
> 
> I can't do anything with this, you've not provided a signoff.  Please
> resend with a signoff - see SubmittingPatches for details on what this
> means and why it's important.
> 
> I also only have patches 4 and 5 of this series and no cover letter,
> what is going on there?
> 

Hi Mark,

Submitting patchsets for multiple subsystems is not straightforward, the cover-letter should also have been sent to linux-spi ML, lesson learned !

Jerome left my signoff because the patches were left untouched from my branch.
Nevertheless, I will submit these patches 4 & 5 in a separate SPI serie, please ignore them in this patchset.

Thanks,
Neil