[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3028577.HpC29kEMTB@wuerfel>
Date: Thu, 08 Sep 2016 14:14:50 +0200
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@...com>
Cc: Felipe Balbi <balbi@...nel.org>,
Peter Chen <hzpeterchen@...il.com>, Leo Li <pku.leo@...il.com>,
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Yoshihiro Shimoda <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@...esas.com>,
"linux-usb@...r.kernel.org" <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@...com>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Stuart Yoder <stuart.yoder@....com>,
Scott Wood <oss@...error.net>,
David Fisher <david.fisher1@...opsys.com>,
"Thang Q. Nguyen" <tqnguyen@....com>,
Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] usb: dwc3: host: inherit dma configuration from parent dev
On Thursday, September 8, 2016 3:02:56 PM CEST Grygorii Strashko wrote:
> dwc3: probe()
> if (!&pdev->dev->of_node)
> legacy case - hard-code DMA props
> dwc->sysdev = &pdev->dev;
The PCI case will fall into this too, as we almost never have an
->of_node pointer for a PCI device.
Do we actually have any legacy dwc3 users in Linux that are neither DT
nor PCI based? Maybe we can just skip that.
> else
> dev = &pdev->dev;
> do {
> if (is_device_dma_capable(dev)) {
> dwc->sysdev = dev;
> break;
> }
> dev = dev->parent;
> while (dev);
> ^this cycle can be limited in depth (2 for PCI)
Right, this could work by itself and looks generic enough.
Arnd
Powered by blists - more mailing lists