lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4a199a95-3ee6-a3a0-bc8a-63bd0912e7d2@suse.de>
Date:   Thu, 8 Sep 2016 14:50:37 +0200
From:   Andreas Färber <afaerber@...e.de>
To:     Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@...libre.com>
Cc:     khilman@...libre.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-spi@...r.kernel.org, broonie@...nel.org, carlo@...one.org,
        linux-amlogic@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] spi: meson: Add Amlogic GXBB compatible

Am 08.09.2016 um 14:04 schrieb Andreas Färber:
> Am 08.09.2016 um 09:53 schrieb Neil Armstrong:
>> This patchset adds a specific compatible string in the Meson SPIFC driver for
>> the Amlogic Meson GXBB SoC.
> 
> Any particular reason? We could just reuse the meson6 one since there
> appear to be no code changes so far.

So Neil is essentially telling me they don't know whether there are any
differences in the IP block, so a separate compatible string was chosen.

No objection from my side, but a general clarification from device tree
maintainers when and when not to would be appreciated. (+ devicetree)

Cheers,
Andreas

-- 
SUSE Linux GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton
HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ