[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Fri, 9 Sep 2016 06:46:37 +0000
From: "S.H. Xie" <shaohui.xie@....com>
To: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>
CC: "devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"robh+dt@...nel.org" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
"mark.rutland@....com" <mark.rutland@....com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"catalin.marinas@....com" <catalin.marinas@....com>,
"will.deacon@....com" <will.deacon@....com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Mihai Emilian Bantea" <mihai.bantea@....com>,
"C.H. Zhao" <chenhui.zhao@....com>,
"arnd@...db.de" <arnd@...db.de>, "Z.Q. Hou" <zhiqiang.hou@....com>,
"M.H. Lian" <minghuan.lian@....com>,
Vincent Hu <mingkai.hu@....com>,
"Horia Geanta Neag" <horia.geanta@....com>,
"Q.Y. Gong" <qianyu.gong@....com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 3/7] [v2] arm64: dts: add QorIQ LS1046A SoC support
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Shawn Guo [mailto:shawnguo@...nel.org]
> Sent: Thursday, September 08, 2016 9:06 PM
> To: shh.xie@...il.com
> Cc: devicetree@...r.kernel.org; robh+dt@...nel.org; mark.rutland@....com;
> linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org; catalin.marinas@....com;
> will.deacon@....com; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; Mihai Emilian Bantea
> <mihai.bantea@....com>; C.H. Zhao <chenhui.zhao@....com>; arnd@...db.de;
> S.H. Xie <shaohui.xie@....com>; Z.Q. Hou <zhiqiang.hou@....com>; M.H. Lian
> <minghuan.lian@....com>; Vincent Hu <mingkai.hu@....com>; Horia Geanta
> Neag <horia.geanta@....com>; Q.Y. Gong <qianyu.gong@....com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/7] [v2] arm64: dts: add QorIQ LS1046A SoC support
>
> On Mon, Sep 05, 2016 at 06:01:31PM +0800, shh.xie@...il.com wrote:
> > + soc {
> > + compatible = "simple-bus";
> > + #address-cells = <2>;
> > + #size-cells = <2>;
> > + ranges;
> > +
> > + clockgen: clocking@...1000 {
> > + compatible = "fsl,ls1046a-clockgen";
> > + reg = <0x0 0x1ee1000 0x0 0x1000>;
> > + #clock-cells = <2>;
> > + clocks = <&sysclk>;
> > + };
> > +
> > + scfg: scfg@...0000 {
>
> Instead of having device node in arbitrary place, can we sort all the nodes under
> 'simple-bus' in order of unit-address?
[S.H] Will sort the nodes in order of unit-address in next version.
Thanks,
Shaohui
Powered by blists - more mailing lists