linux-kernel - Re: Build failures in -next: sys_pkey

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 12 Sep 2016 13:33:44 -0700
From:   Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc:     Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        "open list:ABI/API" <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Build failures in -next: sys_pkey_mprotect etc. undefined

On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 10:28:56PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Monday, September 12, 2016 1:09:17 PM CEST Dave Hansen wrote:
> > 
> > So, I've done what Arnd suggested, but I don't have a working
> > cross-compiler than can do h8300 or c6x.  Could you test the attached
> > patch and see if it gets things working for you?
> > 
> > Also, do you have a handy place to grab a cross-compiler for h8300
> > without having to build one?  The kernel.org ones don't seem to work for
> > h8300.
> > 
> 
> I haven't tested it, but it looks good to me
> 
> Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
> 
> FWIW, you should be able to test this with an arm64 cross-compiler
> too, many distros ship one.
> 
arm64 builds fine, though, even w/o this patch (at least for me).

Guenter