linux-kernel - Re: Build failures in -next: sys_pkey

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <57D7116E.4050708@linux.intel.com>
Date:   Mon, 12 Sep 2016 13:34:54 -0700
From:   Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc:     Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        "open list:ABI/API" <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Build failures in -next: sys_pkey_mprotect etc. undefined

On 09/12/2016 01:28 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> FWIW, you should be able to test this with an arm64 cross-compiler
> too, many distros ship one.

arm64 build fine for me with and without the patch.  There must be
something else specific to h8300 and the other broken architectures.

Is there some other part of the configuration that could be hiding the
issue in my arm64 build?