linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: cherryview: Do not mask all interrupts on probe

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 12 Sep 2016 21:04:44 +0800
From:   Phidias Chiang <phidias.chiang@...onical.com>
To:     Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     Anisse Astier <anisse@...ier.eu>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>,
        Yu C Chen <yu.c.chen@...el.com>,
        "linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: cherryview: Do not mask all interrupts on probe

On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 12:04:01PM +0300, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> 
> OK, I see what is going on now. When I changed handle_simple_irq to
> handle_bad_irq, the IRQ core in __irq_do_set_handler() thinks the
> handler is uninstalled and masks the line.
> 
> If you change handle_bad_irq to handle_simple_irq, in call to
> gpiochip_irqchip_add(), does it work then?

Yes it does :), thank you for the support!