[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160912131111.GG1811@lahna.fi.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2016 16:11:11 +0300
From: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
To: Phidias Chiang <phidias.chiang@...onical.com>
Cc: Anisse Astier <anisse@...ier.eu>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>,
Yu C Chen <yu.c.chen@...el.com>,
"linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: cherryview: Do not mask all interrupts on probe
On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 09:04:44PM +0800, Phidias Chiang wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 12:04:01PM +0300, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> >
> > OK, I see what is going on now. When I changed handle_simple_irq to
> > handle_bad_irq, the IRQ core in __irq_do_set_handler() thinks the
> > handler is uninstalled and masks the line.
> >
> > If you change handle_bad_irq to handle_simple_irq, in call to
> > gpiochip_irqchip_add(), does it work then?
>
> Yes it does :), thank you for the support!
Thanks for testing.
So we need to use handle_simple_irq here instead.
Linus, do you see any problems with that?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists