lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2016 19:10:10 +0200 From: Daniele Venzano <venza@...wnhat.org> To: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@....samsung.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org CC: netdev@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/15] sis900: use IS_ENABLED() instead of checking for built-in or module On 12 September 2016 16:03:43 CEST, Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@....samsung.com> wrote: >The IS_ENABLED() macro checks if a Kconfig symbol has been enabled >either >built-in or as a module, use that macro instead of open coding the >same. > >Using the macro makes the code more readable by helping abstract away >some >of the Kconfig built-in and module enable details. > >Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@....samsung.com> Acked-by: Daniele Venzano <venza@...wnhat.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists